Hilmer Report 20 Years On

It seems that 20 year anniversaries are often widely celebrated.  One 20 year anniversary this year which will probably not receive much attention this year is the Hilmer report into competition policy in Australia. 

The Hilmer report had the agricultural sector firmly in its sights and in particular statutory marketing authorities.  Since the release of the Hilmer report, most of the marketing arrangements viewed as anti-competitive have been removed.  The only on remaining to my knowledge is the regulation of potato marketing in Western Australia. 

While the reduction of regulation in industries such as dairy and eggs had commenced before the release of the Hilmer report, competition policy increased the momentum for change.  For a number of producers in these industries, the move to deregulation was extremely difficult with large numbers exiting these industries in the years that followed it. 

Reduction in regulation in other agricultural industries has also occurred for other reasons.  An example is the removal of the single desk marketing arrangements for wheat marketing which occurred after the Iraq wheat scandal. 

In other sectors of the economy, competition policy has produced mixed results.  There have been a number of success stories, an example being the telecommunications sector where increased competition has benefited consumers. 

A number of other industries have emerged virtually unchanged despite the blow torch being applied in the Hilmer report and in subsequent inquiries.  It remains a mystery why Governments around Australia can find the political courage to deregulate agricultural industries but refuse to take action on industries such as taxis and pharmacies. 

In some industries competition has lessened with the obvious being supermarkets where the two players dominate.  A key component of the Hilmer reforms were changes to the Trade Practices Act and the creation of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission in part to address anti-competitive practices.  Despite these changes we have a situation where Woolworths and Coles continue to increase their market share.  While it could be argued that consumers have benefited from lower prices, the longer term benefits are less certain.  The increase in home brands by the major supermarket brands will ultimately lessen competition. 

The provision of cheap milk may benefit consumers in the short term, but the longer term effects are less certain.  It could result in less fresh milk being available to consumers as farmers exit the industry and greater reliance on UHT milk. 

The changes introduced from the Hilmer report are essentially irreversible.  It would be very difficult if not impossible to reintroduce statutory marketing authorities that previously existed.  What should happen now is that competition should be extended to other areas of the economy.